| The
signals on file are the voltages between each electrode and CMS. These
raw signals on file, still contain some CM signal (50 Hz, ADC reference
noise, etc.). This CM signal cancels after a further subtraction step. It
is important to realize that our front-end digitizes the EEG signal AND
the common mode. The common mode is rejected by subtracting digital data.
Thus, the signals are treated fully differential all the way, from electrode
to digital output. This is different form many other systems where the subtraction
step is made with analog circuitry before the ADC. One of the advantages
our method is that noise and drift on the (common) ADC reference voltage
can be eliminated too. |
| |
| Suppose,
for example, that you want to use the signals with respect to Cz for your
further source estimation calculations. In that case. You simply subtract
the signal in the Cz channel from all other channels. This generates a new
array of data (with one channel less of course) that you can use for further
analysis. |
| |
| When
the CMS electrode is located near Cz (which it usually is) the extra subtraction
step in the example above (choosing Cz as a Reference) won't have much influence
on the EEG part of the signals. However it will decrease the CM interference
part of the signals. |
| |
| Example:
the BDF file contains data like: |
| |
Channel
1 (Oz) = 110uV |
(Both
Oz and Cz contain 50Hz Common Mode. In the BDF file there is no |
| |
Channel
2 (Cz) = 101uV |
information
about the amount of CM. In this example we suppose it is 100uV) |
| |
|
|
|
| From
this you can calculate the voltage between Oz and Cz: |
| Oz
- Cz = 110uV - 101uV = 9 uV of clean EEG signal (without 100 uV of 50 Hz
and other noise) |
| |
| In
this example, the Cz and CMS are close together, and only 1 uV of EEG is
present between them. But, when the recording is made in a shielded room,
the amount of CM in the raw signals would be very small, and the extra subtraction
step wouldn't make much difference. However, in a normal situation with
some residual CM mode signal present, the subtraction in software is essential.
|
|
It would of course be possible to do referencing calculations online during
acquisition (which we actually do for the signals displayed on screen
during acquisition), and also stream the signals to BDF file in referenced
form. But we choose not to do this because you loose information (the
magnitude of the CM, and the offset value(s) of the reference electrode(s))
and flexibility (so long as CMS and DRL are OK, any problem electrode
can be dropped from the calculations afterwards)
|